|
Surfactant treatment
RECOMMENDED PROTOCOL
FOR SURFACTANT USE
Henry Halliday
The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland,
UK
From 44th
Annual Meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR)
Surfactant state of the art and future
developments
The aim of this symposium
was to try to develop a protocol for surfactant treatment. Exciting
new data were presented here today.
The main topics covered
were:
-
Type
of surfactant — natural, synthetic and new generation
agents
Evidence from clinical trials presented here and from the literature
certainly favours the use of natural surfactants rather than
synthetic products for the treatment of RDS[1,2]. Newer generation
surfactant preparations may have a role to play in treating
other respiratory disorders if they can be shown to be more
resistant to inactivation. There are some preliminary data indicating
that increasing the amount of phospholipids in natural surfactants
may overcome inactivation but this remains to be confirmed.
-
Timing of surfactant treatment — prophylaxis, early or
late treatment
Evidence favours prophylaxis for infants of = 31 weeks[3,4]
and early treatment for others.
-
Dose
of surfactant — 100 mg/kg or 200 mg/kg
The recommended dosage may well depend on the timing of administration
(prophylaxis, early or late treatment) and the rate of prenatal
steroid use.
Evidence-based surfactant therapy Results of the Vermont-Oxford
trial of a multifaceted intervention to promote evidence-based
surfactant therapy, provide data from 114 hospitals on surfactant
use[5]. The intervention was successful in reducing the time
to first surfactant treatment from 78 to 21 minutes with more
than half of infants receiving surfactant in the delivery room
compared with 18% of controls. While there was no difference
in survival rates, overall there were significant reductions
in IVH (all grades) and severe IVH (grades 3 and 4), providing
another reason for using surfactant prophylactically or early
(Table 1). A reduction in severe IVH has already been shown
when poractant alfa (Curosurf®, Chiesi Farmaceutici) is
given prophylactically rather than as a later treatment[6].
| Table
1. Summary of results of Vermont–Oxford trial |
| |
Intervention |
Control |
| Time to first dose (minutes) |
21 |
78* |
| Surfactant use in delivery
room (%) |
55 |
18* |
| IVH (%) |
28 |
33* |
| Severe IVH |
10 |
14* |
| **P<0.001, *P<0.05 |
|
Recommended protocol for surfactant
use
Evidence presented here
and results of recent trials allow us to recommend a protocol for
surfactant use depending on GA. In infants with a GA of <27–28
weeks, prophylaxis with a natural surfactant (100 mg/kg) is recommended.
In those of 29–31 weeks GA, early nCPAP with early rescue
with natural surfactant (100 mg/kg) is the recommended treatment
of choice, while observation is advised initially in those =32 weeks
GA with surfactant treatment when more than 40% oxygen is needed
(Table 2).
| Table
2. Recommended protocol for surfactant use |
| GA <27–28 weeks |
GA 29–31 weeks |
GA =32 weeks |
Prophylaxis in delivery room
(100 mg/kg) |
Early nCPAP |
Observe |
Extubate to nCPAP (usually possible
in babies >24 weeks) |
Early rescue with 100 mg/kg if FiO2
>0.30 ± white chest X-ray |
Rescue with 100–200 mg/kg if FiO2
>0.40 ± white chest X-ray |
|
References
- Halliday HL. Drugs 1996;51:226–37.
- Ainsworth SB et al. Lancet 2000;355:1387–92.
- Soll RF, Morley CJ. In: The Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews, The Cochrane Library, Volume 3, 2003.
- Egberts J et al. Pediatrics 1997;100(1):E4.
- Horbar JD et al. Pediatr Res 2003;368A:abstract 2093.
- Walti H et al. Biol Neonate 2002;81:182–7.
top

|
|