| |
Extract from:
Laryngeal Mask Airway for the Interhospital Transport of Neonates
Daniele Trevisanuto, MD, Chandy Verghese, MD, Nicoletta Doglioni, MD, Paola Ferrarese, MD and Vincenzo Zanardo, MD
Pediatrics 2005; 115: e109-111 (Full text) |
24/01/2005
LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY FOR THE
INTERHOSPITAL TRANSPORT OF NEONATES
The laryngeal mask
airway has been established as a safe reliable tool in both
adult and pediatric practice, in particular for airway control
during interhospital transport of infants with congenital
airway malformations.
The laryngeal mask airway
(LMA) is an airway management device developed by Dr Archie
Brain in 1981 and introduced into clinical practice for anesthesia
and resuscitation of adult and pediatric patients. The device
designed by Brain, modified and improved over the last 10
years, combines ease of insertion and adequate airway patency.
In particular, the LMA has proved to be useful for neonatal
transportation if other forms of airway management fail. Airway
control during interhospital transfer may present serious
management difficulties, even for experienced personnel. In
several case reports the LMA positioning has confirmed its
ease of placement even by inexperienced personnel (Pediatrics
2005; 115: e109-111 Full
Text)
In situations of severe
congenital airway malformation of the infant, the LMA allows
effective ventilation and oxygenation, as its insertion technique,
stable positioning and function is not influenced by anatomical
factors. The LMA use is determined by the failure of conventional
modes of ventilation (facial mask and tracheal intubation),
which may be also caused by congenital airway abnormalities
of the infant. Furthermore, in comparison with the face mask,
positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is achieved and maintained
with the LMA requiring less skill.
Because of its ease
of placement and its relative long acceptance by the patients
- in 3 of 5 cases no sedative and/or paralytic drugs were
used, the LMA may play an important role in airway management
in all phases of the transport process, even during helicopter
transportation.
Advantages of
the LMA over the face mask
By developing the LMA manipulation of the patient’s
head, neck, and jaw is not required and compression of facial
nerves is avoided. The LMA enhances a better airtight seal,
providing more effective PPV. A meta-analysis (Brimacombe
J. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42(11): 1017 PubMed)
including 52 randomised prospective trials reported that the
advantages of the LMA over the face mask included:
- easier placement by inexperienced
personnel
- improved oxygen saturation
- less hand fatigue
- improved operating conditions during
minor pediatric otological surgery.
Advantages of
the LMA over endotracheal intubation
The LMA avoids laryngoscopy and all of its related adverse
effects and with respect to the respiratory tract it is also
less invasive. LMA positioning and removal involve a lower
haemodynamic stress response by the patient, and this could
theoretically reduce the incidence of cerebral haemorrhage
in neonates. Furthermore the LMA use avoids tracheal oedema,
which on the contrary may be caused by tracheal intubation.
The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube also include
increased speed and ease of placement by both anaesthetists
and trained non-medical personnel.
Official Scientific
Societies, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics,
suggested that the LMA may represent an effective alternative
for maintaining a patent airway if bag-mask ventilation is
ineffective or intubation fails.
In addition the feasibility of administering surfactant using
the LMA has been studied in eight preterm infants with respiratory
distress syndrome (Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;
89(6): F485-9. PubMed).
The data gained indicate that a rapid and non-invasive access
to the trachea of preterm infants can be obtained by using
the LMA as a conduit to administer surfactant.
Although the LMA cannot
be considered as a routine substitute for the tracheal tube,
and further studies are required to compare all of its advantages
and limits with conventional devices currently used, features
of more recent LMA versions highlight potential optimal conditions
for use in neonatal patients.
Top


|
|